Différences

Ci-dessous, les différences entre deux révisions de la page.

--- 3_composition:texte:paragraphes:supprimer_l_indentation_en_debut_de_paragraphe [2018/05/22 19:44]
joseph.wright
+++ 3_composition:texte:paragraphes:supprimer_l_indentation_en_debut_de_paragraphe [2018/06/03 14:21]
samcarter
@@ Ligne 1: / Ligne 1: @@
-# Zero paragraph indent
+---
+title: Zero paragraph indent
+category: formatting
+permalink: /FAQ-parskip
+date: 2014-06-10
+---
 The conventional way of typesetting running text has no separation
@@ Ligne 7: / Ligne 12: @@
 In contrast, one common convention for typewritten text was to have no
 indentation of paragraphs; such a style is often required for
-''brutalist'' publications such as technical manuals, and in styles
+"brutalist" publications such as technical manuals, and in styles
 that hanker after typewritten manuscripts, such as
 officially-specified dissertation formats.
@@ Ligne 24: / Ligne 29: @@
 However, the non-zero `\parskip` interferes with lists and the like,
-and the result looks pretty awful.  The [`parskip`](http://ctan.org/pkg/parskip) package
+and the result looks pretty awful.  The [`parskip`](https://ctan.org/pkg/parskip) package
 patches things up to look reasonable; it's not perfect, but it deals
 with most problems.
 The Netherlands Users' Group's set of classes includes an
-[`article`](http://ctan.org/pkg/article) equivalent ([`artikel3`](http://ctan.org/pkg/artikel3)) and a [`report`](http://ctan.org/pkg/report)
+[`article`](https://ctan.org/pkg/article) equivalent ([`artikel3`](https://ctan.org/pkg/ntgclass)) and a [`report`](https://ctan.org/pkg/report)
-equivalent ([`rapport3`](http://ctan.org/pkg/rapport3)) whose design incorporates zero paragraph
+equivalent ([`rapport3`](https://ctan.org/pkg/ntgclass)) whose design incorporates zero paragraph
 indent and non-zero paragraph skip.
-----
-Content last updated: 2014-06-10