Différences

Ci-dessous, les différences entre deux révisions de la page.

--- 3_composition:annexes:bibliographie:trier_une_bibliographie [2018/05/23 21:22]
joseph.wright
+++ 3_composition:annexes:bibliographie:trier_une_bibliographie [2018/12/03 23:03]
jejust
@@ Ligne 1: / Ligne 1: @@
----
+====== Sorting lists of citations ======
-section: Bibliographies and citations
-subsection: Creating citations
-revised: 2014-06-10
----
-# Sorting lists of citations
 BibTeX has a sorting function, and most BibTeX styles sort the
@@ Ligne 10: / Ligne 6: @@
 However, it is perfectly possible to write a
-`thebibliography` environment that _looks_ as if it
+''thebibliography'' environment that //looks// as if it
 came from BibTeX, and many people do so (in order to save time in
 the short term).
-The problem arises when `thebibliography`-writers decide
+The problem arises when ''thebibliography''-writers decide
 their citations need to be sorted.  A common misapprehension is to
-insert `\bibliographystyle{alpha}` (or similar) and expect
+insert ''\bibliographystyle{alpha}'' (or similar) and expect
 the typeset output to be sorted in some magical way.  BibTeX
-doesn't work that way!&nbsp;&mdash; if you write `thebibliography`,
+doesn't work that way! --- if you write ''thebibliography'',
 you get to sort its contents.  BibTeX will only sort the contents
-of a `thebibliography` environment when it creates it, to
+of a ''thebibliography'' environment when it creates it, to
-be inserted from a `bbl` file by a `\bibliography` command.
+be inserted from a ''bbl'' file by a ''\bibliography'' command.
+-----
+//Source:// [[faquk>FAQ-sortbib|Sorting lists of citations]]
+{{htmlmetatags>metatag-keywords=(LaTeX,bibliographies)
+metatag-og:title=(Sorting lists of citations)
+metatag-og:site_name=(FAQ LaTeX francophone)
+}}