Différences

Ci-dessous, les différences entre deux révisions de la page.

Lien vers cette vue comparative

Les deux révisions précédentes Révision précédente
Prochaine révision
Révision précédente
Prochaine révision Les deux révisions suivantes
2_programmation:qualite_de_votre_code_latex [2018/06/03 13:17]
d.p.carlisle
2_programmation:qualite_de_votre_code_latex [2018/12/03 23:29]
jejust
Ligne 1: Ligne 1:
---- +====== The quality of your LaTeX ======
-title: The quality of your LaTeX +
-category: programming +
-tags: +
-  - latex +
-  - macros +
-permalink: /FAQ-latexqual +
----+
  
-The [`l2tabu`](https://ctan.org/pkg/l2tabututorial (mentioned in  + 
-[online introductions](FAQ-man-latex)) is undoubtedly a+The [[ctanpkg>l2tabu|l2tabu]] tutorial (mentioned in  
 +[[FAQ-man-latex|online introductions]]) is undoubtedly a
 good read. good read.
  
 However, it's always difficult to remember the things you should However, it's always difficult to remember the things you should
-_not_ do, when there are so many things to remember that you +//not// do, when there are so many things to remember that you 
-really must do: some automation is useful….+really must do: some automation is useful....
  
-The nicely-named [`nag`](https://ctan.org/pkg/nagallows you to apply a configurable set+The nicely-named [[ctanpkg>nag|nag]] allows you to apply a configurable set
 of checks to your document, as you run it through LaTeX; you get of checks to your document, as you run it through LaTeX; you get
 messages like: messages like:
-```latex+ 
 +<code latex>
 Package nag Warning: Command \bf is an old LaTeX 2.09 command.  Package nag Warning: Command \bf is an old LaTeX 2.09 command. 
 (nag)                Use \bfseries or \textbf instead on input line 30. (nag)                Use \bfseries or \textbf instead on input line 30.
-```+</code>
   (the package provides a demo file which contains most of the sorts   (the package provides a demo file which contains most of the sorts
-  of errors you might make&nbsp;&mdash; the example is one of them). +  of errors you might make --- the example is one of them). 
-While [`l2tabu`](https://ctan.org/pkg/l2tabu) and [`nag`](https://ctan.org/pkg/nag) alert you to _possible_+While [[ctanpkg>l2tabu|l2tabu]and [[ctanpkg>nag|nag]] alert you to //possible//
 programming errors, you should not forget that they are merely programming errors, you should not forget that they are merely
-commenting on _style_; don't assume that a [`nag`](https://ctan.org/pkg/nagerror is +commenting on //style//; don't assume that a [[ctanpkg>nag|nag]] error is 
-going to damn your code&nbsp;&mdash; rather, note the issue and try to train+going to damn your code --- rather, note the issue and try to train
 your fingers not to do the same "next time". your fingers not to do the same "next time".
  
-The `lacheckprogram analyses your source and comments on +The ''lacheck'' program analyses your source and comments on 
-it; its view of what is "bad" is _very_ subjective (the+it; its view of what is "bad" is //very// subjective (the
 documentation says), but it can be useful. documentation says), but it can be useful.
  
  
  
 +
 +-----
 +
 +//Source:// [[faquk>FAQ-latexqual|The quality of your LaTeX]]
 +
 +{{htmlmetatags>metatag-keywords=(LaTeX,latex,macros,programming)
 +metatag-og:title=(The quality of your LaTeX)
 +metatag-og:site_name=(FAQ LaTeX francophone)
 +}}
  
2_programmation/qualite_de_votre_code_latex.txt · Dernière modification: 2021/04/08 11:01 de yannick.tanguy
CC Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International
Driven by DokuWiki Recent changes RSS feed Valid CSS Valid XHTML 1.0