Différences

Ci-dessous, les différences entre deux révisions de la page.

--- 2_programmation:qualite_de_votre_code_latex [2018/06/03 13:17]
d.p.carlisle
+++ 2_programmation:qualite_de_votre_code_latex [2018/12/03 23:29]
jejust
@@ Ligne 1: / Ligne 1: @@
----
+====== The quality of your LaTeX ======
-title: The quality of your LaTeX
-category: programming
-tags:
-  - latex
-  - macros
-permalink: /FAQ-latexqual
----
-The [`l2tabu`](https://ctan.org/pkg/l2tabu) tutorial (mentioned in
-[online introductions](FAQ-man-latex)) is undoubtedly a
+The [[ctanpkg>l2tabu|l2tabu]] tutorial (mentioned in
+[[FAQ-man-latex|online introductions]]) is undoubtedly a
 good read.
 However, it's always difficult to remember the things you should
-_not_ do, when there are so many things to remember that you
+//not// do, when there are so many things to remember that you
-really must do: some automation is useful&hellip;.
+really must do: some automation is useful....
-The nicely-named [`nag`](https://ctan.org/pkg/nag) allows you to apply a configurable set
+The nicely-named [[ctanpkg>nag|nag]] allows you to apply a configurable set
 of checks to your document, as you run it through LaTeX; you get
 messages like:
-```latex
+<code latex>
 Package nag Warning: Command \bf is an old LaTeX 2.09 command.
 (nag)                Use \bfseries or \textbf instead on input line 30.
-```
+</code>
   (the package provides a demo file which contains most of the sorts
-  of errors you might make&nbsp;&mdash; the example is one of them).
+  of errors you might make --- the example is one of them).
-While [`l2tabu`](https://ctan.org/pkg/l2tabu) and [`nag`](https://ctan.org/pkg/nag) alert you to _possible_
+While [[ctanpkg>l2tabu|l2tabu]] and [[ctanpkg>nag|nag]] alert you to //possible//
 programming errors, you should not forget that they are merely
-commenting on _style_; don't assume that a [`nag`](https://ctan.org/pkg/nag) error is
+commenting on //style//; don't assume that a [[ctanpkg>nag|nag]] error is
-going to damn your code&nbsp;&mdash; rather, note the issue and try to train
+going to damn your code --- rather, note the issue and try to train
 your fingers not to do the same "next time".
-The `lacheck` program analyses your source and comments on
+The ''lacheck'' program analyses your source and comments on
-it; its view of what is "bad" is _very_ subjective (the
+it; its view of what is "bad" is //very// subjective (the
 documentation says), but it can be useful.
+-----
+//Source:// [[faquk>FAQ-latexqual|The quality of your LaTeX]]
+{{htmlmetatags>metatag-keywords=(LaTeX,latex,macros,programming)
+metatag-og:title=(The quality of your LaTeX)
+metatag-og:site_name=(FAQ LaTeX francophone)
+}}