Ceci est une ancienne révision du document !

— title: Defining characters as macros category: programming tags: macros permalink: /FAQ-activechars date: 2014-06-10 —

Single characters can act as macros (defined commands), and both Plain TeX and LaTeX define the character `~` as a non-breakable space. A character is made definable, or active, by setting its _category code_ (catcode) to be `\active` (13): ```latex \catcode`\_=\active ``` Any character could, in principle, be activated this way and defined as a macro: ```latex \def_{\_} ``` which could be characterised as an over-simple answer to [using underscores](FAQ-underscore). However, you must be wary: whereas people expect an active tilde, other active characters may be unexpected and interact badly with other macros. Furthermore, by defining an active character, you preclude the character's use for other purposes, and there are few characters free to be subverted in this way.

To define the character `z` as a command, one would say something like: ```latex \catcode`\z=\active \def z{Yawn, I'm tired}% ``` and each subsequent `z` in the text would become a yawn. This would be an astoundingly bad idea for most documents, but might have special applications. (Note that, in `\def z`, `z` is no longer interpreted as a letter; the space is therefore not necessary — `\defz` would do; we choose to retain the space, for what little clarity we can manage.) Some LaTeX packages facilitate such definitions. For example, the [`shortvrb`](https://ctan.org/pkg/shortvrb) package with its `\MakeShortVerb` command.

TeX uses category codes to interpret characters as they are read from the input. _Changing a catcode value will not affect characters that have already been read_. Therefore, it is best if characters have fixed category codes for the duration of a document. If catcodes are changed for particular purposes (the `\verb` command does this), then the altered characters will not be interpreted properly when they appear in the argument to another command (as, for example, in [`\verb` in command arguments](FAQ-verbwithin)). An exemplary case is the [`doc`](https://ctan.org/pkg/doc) package, which processes .dtx files using the [`shortvrb`](https://ctan.org/pkg/shortvrb) package to define `|`…`|` as a shorthand for `\verb|`…`|`. But `|` is also used in the preambles of tabular environments, so that tables in `dtx` files can only have vertical line separation between columns by employing special measures of some sort.

Another consequence is that catcode assignments made in macros often don't work as expected (see [Active characters in command arguments](FAQ-actinarg)). For example, the definition <!– {% raw %} –> ```latex \def\mistake{% \catcode`_=\active \def_{\textunderscore\-}% } ``` <!– {% endraw %} –> does not work because it attempts to define an ordinary `_` character: When the macro is used, the category change does not apply to the underscore character already in the macro definition. Instead, one may use: <!– {% raw %} –> ```latex \begingroup \catcode`_=\active \gdef\works{% note the global \gdef


} \endgroup ``` <!– {% endraw %} –> The alternative (tricksy) way of creating such an isolated definition depends on the curious properties of `\lowercase`, which changes characters without altering their catcodes. Since there is always _one_ active character (`~`), we can fool `\lowercase` into patching up a definition without ever explicitly changing a catcode: <!– {% raw %} –> ```latex \begingroup


``` <!– {% endraw %} –> The two definitions have the same overall effect (the character is defined as a command, but the character does not remain active), except that the first defines a `\global` command.

For active characters to be used only in maths mode, it is much better to leave the character having its ordinary catcode, but assign it a special active _maths code_, as with <!– {% raw %} –> ```latex \begingroup


\mathcode`x=“8000 ``` <!– {% endraw %} –> The special character does not need to be redefined whenever it is made active&nbsp;&mdash; the definition of the command persists even if the character's catcode reverts to its original value; the definition becomes accessible again if the character once again becomes active.

2_programmation/macros/definir_un_caracteres_comme_une_macro.1527953692.txt.gz · Dernière modification: 2018/06/02 15:34 de joseph.wright
CC Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International
Driven by DokuWiki Recent changes RSS feed Valid CSS Valid XHTML 1.0